GTA approaches

There are two more days until I set off to London for the Google Teacher Academy, and things seem to be ramping up. For those interested in the event I have written a guest post for the Digital Birmingham Blog, explaining what the event is and what I hope to get out of it.

@knvmcl has also set up a posterous blog where those of us involved will be posting our thoughts as the event nears and takes place. This looks like a great solution for group blogging, as we can just email thoughts and they are automatically posted on the blog. Twitter discussions are also happening if you search for #gtauk.

I’ve spent this afternoon setting up my slides and videos to present on our use of google docs in year 4, and I’m really looking forward to sharing and learning from the google staff, the lead learners, and not least the other participants. Keep an eye on all the above if you are interested, and no doubt I will blog on my reflections again here after the event.

Continuing thoughts on classroom space

Having had some interesting discussion on classroom space in my earlier post, I have been thinking about and discussing this subject a lot.

To me there is a real distinction between ‘forward thinking’ (for want of a better term ’21st Century’) environments, and what is simply non-standard use of classroom space.

To me, the thinking on innovative use of space should start with pedagogy not practicality.

It should be about thinking not fitting things in.

It should sometimes facilitate and sometimes challenge.

It should be based around people, not tools or technology.

It should be about powering up minds, not finding ways to power technology.

It should be about learning not teaching.

For me I think it has to start with the planning. I want to re-imagine how I want lessons and learning to take place in my classroom, come up with a framework that encourages me to plan activities in that way, and only then look at how the furniture can enable this. I think they key is to make both planning and environment flexible, so that they can adapt to the learning as it unfolds.

It’s like the big I.C.T. faux pas; that we often decide what tools or software to ‘teach’ before deciding what we want children to learn. I think we need to decide what directions we want learning to take, and only then define what kind of environment we need.

It really isn’t about furniture.

How could I develop my space?

Over the last week or so it has been decided that I will be spending my second year teaching year 4, although I will be working with a completely new team. I have much to reflect on to inform my practice next year, but I have already decided something I want to work on is my use of space.

I really want to start to use my classroom space to really support my values of a child centred classroom for personalising learning and giving children responsibility and independence over their learning. This year I have reorganised quite a few times, but my placement of the furniture has too often been influence by managing behaviour rather than supporting learning, and this is something I want to change.

The space in my classroom is very limited, although we do have a shared group area with the other year 4 class that I want to make more use of. Therefore organisation of space is often down to how I can actually fit in the tables and chairs for all the children. This may be a mistake to begin with, perhaps I do not need to have tables and chairs for every child to sit down at the same time…

This year I have mostly worked around group desks, partly because that is what I was used to, partly because I like to encourage group interactions, and partly due to my use of Kagan cooperative learning, which is based around groups of 4. More recently I have experimented with creating different areas of the room and allowing the children to choose where they sit. We have had a horseshoe table, desks facing the wall, group tables, and individual island desks. The children have then had to sit with their ‘cooperative partners’, but choose where they sit for different lessons. Asking them to stay with certain partners was intended to trigger conversations and debates on the merits of certain places, and we have had some interesting discussions of learning dispositions and why they choose certain places.

I feel like this is just scratching the surface, and I would be really grateful for ideas, advice, and links to reading on use of space, that I can use to develop my room to really support the kind of learning I want to encourage. Obviously its hard to advise without knowing my room, but I’d really appreciate some ‘blue sky thinking’ on creating a learning environment to support personalised, child centred learning with Key stage 2 pupils.

Problems with timetabled learning

Tweet from @ianaddison: Tweet from ian addison(@ianaddison) Fave QCA example: We must do 6 weeks of email in year 3. 6 weeks!!! @charliedeane’s sch does it as part of her egypt topic! #ukedchat

I noticed this tweet this evening and it really got me thinking. The idea of doing email in a discrete unit of 6 weeks is obviously crackers. It is a communication tool which is best taught in an integrated way in the long term, and for meaningful uses. To teach it once in a big block out of context and then not return to it until the following year is antithetical to the nature of such a tool.

However, how much do we do this with non tech tools? Those following the current Primary Framework for Mathematics in the UK will be familiar of the idea of returning often to different areas of the curriculum to embed and extend knowledge in a natural way, but in most other subjects this doesn’t seem to happen. I think this problem is especially prevalent in Literacy in Primary schools, where certain types of writing (eg persuasion) are taught in one block and then left until the next year. To my mind this just doesn’t fit with how learning works, and the notion that certain styles of writing are needed for certain times. I would much rather my pupils learnt to write persuasively when the need arises for them to do so for a real purpose, not just because I have created a purpose to fit with the timetable of our school year (lets not even go into teaching them to do it without giving a truly authentic purpose, as I suspect many do).

Learning is useless without the ability to apply it, and a big part of applying this type of learning is recognising just when to do so. It is so much harder to decide to apply a certain writing style because you want to achieve a certain effect than applying it because your assessment question uses the magic word ‘persuade’.

The more I work with negotiated and project based learning the more I see that the really hard part for children is not learning what we traditionally see as ‘the curriculum’. The hard part is making those links that will let them actually make use of that learning in their lives. Teaching everything in neat little blocks does little to address this most important of aims.

My Google Teacher Academy Application

This summer Google are expanding their teacher academy from the US and bringing it to the UK. I decided to apply to be a part of it, as it is the collaborative tools that Google (and others) are developing that I feel are the most powerful step forward in educational I.C.T. in recent years.

As part of the application we had to create a one minute video on either ‘Motivation and Learning’ or ‘Classroom Innovation’. As I have written before, I am conflicted about the value of pushing technology for exclusively motivational purposes, so I chose ‘Classroom Innovation’ as my topic. Rather than provide a long list of general innovations I have been involved with, or provide a statement of values that would be difficult to quantify, I decided to be very specific in my focus. My video attempts to detail in one minute how I use Google Docs to facilitate personalised learning in my teaching of writing to my year 4 class. I hope I have achieved a balance between showing the practical and technical side of how this is achieved, and the pedagogical thinking behind its value to learning.

There are only 50 places at this event, and no doubt there will be people applying with many times my experience (it wouldn’t be hard to beat 12 months!). However, I hope I can show that I am innovative and driven to make a difference to education beyond my own classroom to manage to secure a place.

Comments on the video are very welcome!

Edit:
I heard this week that I got a place, and will be heading down to google HQ in about a month. Thanks to everyone who has watched the video or tweeted about this application. I’m really looking forward to learning from the whole experience.

Getting out of my classroom

My time as an NQT is coming to an end, and with it the extra afternoon off time table I get for my professional development. This time has been invaluable this year, sometimes just as a chance to sit back and reflect on my practice, sometimes to give me a bit more time to relieve the pressure of an intense year.

I have used it in many different ways, but one of the most vauable has been observing other lessons. One thing my previous experience in Early Years education and the PGCE gave me was a pretty good overview of the whole of the Primary age group. However, after just short of a year in the job I am rapidly seeing how easy it is to become institutionalized into a certain age range. This is one of the reasons why I cannot see myself ever working in a different setting to a Primary school, as I feel it is really important to keep in mind the longer term, and keep in touch with the learning that has gone before, and that which will come after, the cohort you are teaching. However, just getting involved with other age groups out of the context of the classroom is quite different to experiencing their curriculum based learning, and I have been fortunate to observe across the age range of my school on my NQT afternoons.

Over the past few weeks I have visited a couple of other local schools, and have found this a real eye opener. I can’t understate how easy it is to get into the mindset that your school’s way is the only way things are done, yet both of these visits have provided very clear, yet different, contrasts to what I see every day.

I have seen a vast range of practice in the lessons I have observed, both in my own school and others. Every observation challenges me, as it is so easy to be critical of what I am seeing, but each criticism also makes me recognise occasions when I may make similar decisions in my own teaching. I have observed a few teachers whose approach is fundamentally different to my own, yet who are undeniably very effective practitioners. Such experiences really make me question my motives and my practices, and pick up tips and ideas I would never have come to on my own as they are coming from a different angle to me.

Loss of the opportunity to get this contrasting view to what I am experiencing in my own setting is something I am quite apprehensive about. I hope that I will manage to find time next year to contrast my practice, and the practice of my school, so directly with that of others. I would urge any soon to be NQTs, and even experienced teachers, to get out of their classrooms, and even their schools, and avoid becoming institutionalized into they way things are done where they are. This has certainly been one of the most worth while experiences of my year, and I hope I can continue to be challenged and grow in such a way as I move forward in the profession.

Let’s let students manage real world distractions

Since my recent post on the iPad I have been reading a number of reviews linked to educational use. I keep coming across an assertion that really annoys me, and I think has implications fat wider for education than Apple’s latest shiny device does.

That assertion is that the interface of the iPad only being capable of running one app at a time is a good thing because it will keep students on task, and make it harder for them to flip back to facebook the moment the teacher looks away. The teachers writing this stuff need to wake up! Digital devices are distracting, the Internet is distracting, the entire modern world is distracting. Are we going to prepare students to function effectively in it by shutting it out and locking it down?

We live in a world where the posting of an ancient arcade game on the front page of a search engine can (allegedly) cause $120 million in lost productivity in a single day- I’d say we need to educate people on strategies to avoid distractions! (http://m.guardian.co.uk/?id=102202&story=http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/andrew-clark-on-america/2010/may/25/google-economics)

School should be about engaging pupils in the real world, not shutting them away from it. It might be complicated and it might be hard to prepare for, but it’s what we’ve got to work with or we become irrelevant. So, by all means justify artificial limitations of technology, but please do it in reference to battery life and not to sanitizing and limiting pupils real world experiences.

iPad in Education Event

This morning I attended an event run by a local Apple vendor aimed at showcasing the educational uses of the iPad. I have already blogged about my initial reservations about this device, not merely as a device for education but also as a means of framing users interactions with the internet. Today we had a couple of hours to have a go with the devices, and a presented from an ‘Apple Distinguished Educator’ about possible uses in schools. As this was one of the first education showcases I thought I would share the thoughts we had whilst using it.

Firstly it is undeniably a very nice piece of technology to use. The screen is great, really big and really clear, and fingerprints did not seem to be much of an issue . It is really fast, noticeably snappier than my iPhone 3G, and the netbooks we have in my class. It feels really solid and well built. The keyboard is quite easy to use, although it is difficult to type without resting it on a surface and using both hands.

Whilst the device might be great, as with most hardware it is really the software that makes it, and there were some interesting apps on show. RJDJ was a very interesting experience, allowing the user to manipulate sounds in a very intuitive way that could really help develop listening and composition skills. Maps looks great on a screen this size, and can easily be used between 3 or 4 people at the same time in the middle of a table. The new iWork apps were fairly good for a ‘mobile’ device, although I couldn’t find any way to significantly change fonts in Pages, so they are more limited than ‘real’ versions.

There are, however, significant practical issues which I think make school use problematic. Firstly the price, you could get two very capable netbooks for the price of one these things. Secondly, as I have already expressed, they are devices designed for consumption and content creation is limited in many ways. Thirdly I wonder how durable a large glass screen like that would be. Several netbooks in my class have been dropped this year, and as they are made of plastic and have slight flexibility no real harm has come to them, I can’t imagine a 9 inch sheet of glass faring the same way…

Another limitation is the inherent nature of a touch browser. We use Wallwisher a lot in our school, and whilst at the event I logged into a wall my class was working on with their supply teacher. Unfortunately the website was unable to register my dragging around messages, or the double click required to add new messages to the wall. It seems some mouse driven websites do not translate well to a touch interface. I was also disappointed that Google Docs cannot be edited, only viewed on mobile safari (hopefully only a matter of time).

Apple prides itself on their design, they do not merely produce machines, but fully rounded products which (allegedly) fit into people’s lives. They use this to justify what some people criticize as their limitations and lock downs, after all the iPad is not meant to be a fully functional laptop replacement, but a lifestyle device, and they appear feel this justifies gearing it totally towards content consumption. Therefore, I cannot help feel that them pushing the iPad for education is something of a contradiction. It is a device designed to belong to one person, to be tied to one email account, to contain one diary, and to sync to one computer. It is not designed to have multiple, constantly changing users with different accounts, it is not designed to be one of a deployment of 30 which need to have identical apps installed on them. I couldn’t help feeling that most of the talk of the educators I was with today was about ways of working round the fact that the device had been designed in a certain way, and try to shoehorn it into a situation it was not designed for. Now I am all for using technology in unintended ways, but due to the ecosystem Apple have created around their mobile devices they are pretty uncompromisingly designed for a very different usage scenario than a working classroom.

So, it’s a nice device, but I am currently sticking to my initial impressions that this is not a device best suited to education at the moment. However, after some time using the iPad I came across a spark of something that could give it a very beneficial use. This was in the form of a music keyboard application ‘ProKeys‘, a great little app which simply provides a keyboard, and some really high quality sound banks. What really got me was that one of the two keyboards could be rotated 180 degrees so that two people could play with each other using the multitouch capability to allow them to both fully interact at the same time. This made me think of the Smart Table, and all the collaborative benefits that it was meant to bring. What I have read from trial users such as Tom Barrett, suggested that whilst the hardware was capable of this, the software really wasn’t up to scratch. However, imagine a device with this multitouch capability, added portability, and the ecosystem of Apple’s ‘App Store’ providing a daily evolving set of software and we might just have something quite exciting. If software providers can develop this path of genuinely collaborative applications designed for interaction from multiple people, the iPad could be a really interesting device, especially in the Early Years and Key Stage One. Rather than being some kind of netbook replacement this avenue could allow iPads in schools to be the genuinely niche devices that Apple depict them as, but with a real value for education.

Ultimately it is all about the Apps, and as with any new device these are just getting started. I will be very interested to see if developers catch on to this potential for collaborative learning, and if they do it might just be worth working round the ‘limitations’.

PGCE to NQT: Some reflections

A few weeks ago the time came to teach my year 4 class a Science unit on forces, the same unit which comprised the first lessons I taught as a PGCE student. I remembered these lessons fondly; looking back they seemed a model of teaching when I had a huge amount of time to spend on planning and resourcing, a whole morning to prepare for teaching, and a class of angelic pupils to deliver it to.

I thought it would be an interesting opportunity to revisit the planning I for these lessons, and base my teaching on them- after all there is no way I would have the kind of time I had then to plan the unit this time round. On revisiting these plans that I felt I had perfected, and had reflected on positively at length in an MA essay, I was surprised to feel they fell rather short of my expectations. They weren’t bad, but I felt I could plan the same sort of thing very quickly these days, and they seemed hugely lacking in several areas I now try to make key to my lessons.

This provided a moment of realisation for me as to how much I have learned over the last 18 months, but also a realisation as to how easy it is to take this for granted. There is always another area to develop in this job, and as soon as one thing is mastered it often becomes automatic, and is quickly obscured by the next thing that needs to be worked on.

I started thinking about the difference between myself a year ago and now, and what I have learned since I started doing the job full time. There are many obvious transitions; the full timetable, the relative lack of time to catch your breath and reflect, the opportunity to follow and affect the achievements of a group of children over a whole year rather than only a few weeks. Personally I have also had a huge learning curve this year in several areas, notably managing a challenging class.

However, for me there is one fundamental shift in my thinking from my PGCE days. As a trainee I spent a year first trying to work out what kind of teacher I wanted to be, and then striving to be that kind of teacher. Possibly rather arrogantly this was often based on coming across the kinds of teachers I did not want to be, and throughout my PGCE I felt I was coming up against tutors, mentors and colleagues who really didn’t ‘get’ where I was coming from. I was criticised for making activities ‘too open ended’, and for my nascent attempts to promote responsibility and self control in behaviour management. To a certain extent these experiences merely strengthened my resolve that I knew what kind of teacher I wanted to be, and I had to continue to try to become that person.

I think that was a very important process to go through, but after two terms working with the realities of being a full time teacher in an urban school my point of view has changed. Thankfully I found a school and a head who really fitted the kind of teacher I wanted to be; a school with a culture that supported childrens’ independence, interests and personalities, and a leadership team who support staff to be the teachers they want to be rather than telling them who they should be. I set up my classroom and started the year as the kind of teacher I wanted to be, but I quickly found this wasn’t enough. Some in my class jumped headfirst into my world of independence and flexibility and thrived. However, a significant number obviously found this world confusing and struggled to behave appropriately in it.

Such circumstances have made me realise that whilst it is very valuable to frame what kind of teacher you want to be, in reality to be the best teacher you must try be a different person for every class, and even individual. This year I have reacted in ways I would never have imagined when wearing the rose tinted glasses of a trainee. Many times I have done things which I know I would have been quite critical of had I observed a teacher doing them last year, but I have come to realise that sometimes to get the best out of children you have to be the person they need, not the person you want to be.

For me this is the biggest transition I have made from PGCE to NQT, the realisation that what children actually need is much more important than what I want to provide them with.

Personalising writing lessons with the new Google Docs

We currently have a strong focus on developing writing in our school, and I have been working for some time of developing the structure of my writing lessons to get the best out of the pupils in my class. On the advice of Zoe Case (@ZCase), a fellow NQT I have been trying to really up the pace of lessons where children are working on extended writing by introducing a very stop-start structure into them. As well as using success criteria devised by the chilldren with regular interruptions to check they have followed them and remind them to do so, I have also been setting short term challenges to write exciting sentences to share with the whole class mid writing. I have also been setting specific challenges, such as “In the next three minutes write a sentences describing using two senses”.

Whilst this has certainly been beneficial, and I have really noticed many children pushing their writing skills, I would really perfer to take a more personalised and fluid approach to this, and up the amount of meaningful engagement I actually have with the work they are producing rather than simply pulling them back on a predetermined track at regular intervals.

We have been using Google Docs on our netbooks since September, and I initially hoped that it would allow this kind of personalised interaction with the process of pupil’s writing. However, I have never quite managed to achieve what I had hoped on reading Tom Barratt’s writing on ‘live marking’. I always found the 5 or so minutes delay before updates to be a bit clunky. This was even more obvious when the children tried to use it to collaborate in real time- and our project to co-write a book on Ancient Egypt was  ditched as Docs seemed intent on overwriting large chunks work every time it updated (something I also found happened with Wikis).

Thankfully Google have recently announced a completely rewritten version of the Docs editor which appears to iron out many of the issues. For me, the big draw is the new collaboration features- including changes updating character by character as each collaborator types. This makes collaboration truly real time, as it allows you to see and react to what a child is writing immediately, as well as them reacting to any comments you make in the same way. It is not yet available as the default to Google Apps users,  but I used a work around (detailed below) to set it up across my whole class for our descriptive writing lesson this morning, and it worked like a dream.

The speed of updating really clinched it for me- it allows such seamless engagement with a huge range of  the work pupils are actually doing. Open a number of pieces of work in tabs of the web browser, and instead of stopping the whole class you can actually engage in the writing process of several pupils at once. Whilst you are waiting for one pupil to react to advice or questions you can be looking at the work of another and directing questions their way. Granted this is potentially possible with handwritten work, but it is so much less intrusive than leaning over their shoulder, or asking to read their book. In the confined space of my classroom it is difficult to quickly move through the room and truly keep tabs on what is being written. With multiple Docs open you can quickly scan through work as it is being written and, critically, to notice where you need to intervene at the point of learning, and where a child’s writing is best left uninterrupted. All this without interrupting their though processes and flow, that is unless you feel it is appropriate. I would still prefer this interaction happen verbally, but it can be useful to show children what you mean, and with the chat feature this could even happen if they were working in a different room (as often happens in years 5 and 6 at our school), or even from home.

Conversely it can also be leveraged to be more intrusive than working in books for those pupils who find concentration on tasks difficult. A number of such pupils in my class found it very motivating to be slightly unsure of whether I was checking up on what they were doing, and any comments I made on their focus were able to be directed on their work itself rather than the outward signs of a lack of productivity. In a more positive sense they found it really motivational to know I was actively monitoring what they were doing, and it seemed to provoke in them the feelings of writing for an audience in a way that I never usually see.

Such a system also allows for effortless assessment for learning, as a notable example for praise, modelling, or evaluation can be displayed on our class projector in literally seconds, with the child in question making live changes as the class reacts to it. I often use my visualiser to such ends during writing lessons, but this system removes all the faffing with children coming to the front, aligning their books and focusing the lens. As with much of what I have described, this could be achieved with more conventional tools, but the effortlessness of it just makes it so much more possible to create that stop-start, focused and challenging writing environment which I have been trying to achieve.

On the face of my, admittedly short, experience so far, the new Docs seems to be a triumph for personalisation and assessment for learning in writing. Granted, I have only scratched the surface of the new version, but I can see myself taking a big jump forward in personalising the learning of writing in my class now that I have access to this tool.

More info on the latest version of Docs (and a quick demo of the live updating collaboration) in this video:

New Docs in Apps for your domain work-around

This may be really obvious, but I thought some people might not have thought of it so was worth sharing. You can’t yet enable the new docs editor across all accounts on your domain. However, any document created in the new editor stays there even when you share it, so you can push out copies of a doc in the new editor as follows:

1. Log into your account, and follow Google’s instructions to enable the new editor for this account:

“visit the Editing tab in the Google docs list settings. Check the box next to “New version of Google documents,” and all new and uploaded documents will be created in the new editor.”

2. Create a new Document, you can either keep it blank or put in some info about the task you want children to do.

3. Share this document with your class (I do this by copying the link and using twitter). I always share things with them as ‘View only’, and have trained them to ‘Make a Copy’ for themselves and then share it back with me. This allows me to send them template documents without them being able to mess up the template.

Hopefully it will become easy to enable the new Docs editor across our domains very soon and this will become unnecessary.